There was an unusual security build-up on the National Assembly superior on Monday evening.
BusinessDay observed that as a minimum 5 police patrol vehicles had been stationed on the Mopol Gate entrance of the superior.
While actions remained common all through official working hours, security presence intensified between 5:30 pm and 6 pm, shortly after the shut of labor.
The heightened security comes a day sooner than Akpoti-Uduaghan’s deliberate return to the Senate.
The embattled lawmaker had, all through a televised interview on Saturday, declared her intention to resume plenary on Tuesday, July 22, 2025, citing a present Federal High Court judgment as a result of the licensed basis for her return.
However, the Senate has strongly opposed her interpretation of the ruling, insisting that there is no such thing as a such factor as a reputable courtroom order mandating her quick recall.
Akpoti-Uduaghan’s announcement adopted ongoing licensed and procedural tussles over a July 4 judgment delivered by Justice Binta Nyako, which she claims helps her return.
But the Senate maintains that the judgment does not amount to an enforceable directive.
In a press launch issued on Sunday and signed by Yemi Adaramodu, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, the Senate reiterated its place that no subsisting order mandates Akpoti-Uduaghan’s reinstatement.
“The Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria wishes to reaffirm, for the third time, that there is no subsisting court order mandating the Senate to recall Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan before the expiration of her suspension,” the assertion study.
Adaramodu well-known that the courtroom merely offered a non-binding advisory, suggesting that the Senate may take into consideration reviewing its Standing Orders and the scale of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension, which the courtroom opined may very well be excessive.
“However, the court explicitly held that the Senate did not breach any law or constitutional provision in imposing the disciplinary measure based on the Senator’s misconduct during plenary,” he clarified.
The Senate moreover emphasised that Akpoti-Uduaghan was found accountable of contempt of courtroom and sanctioned accordingly.
The sanctions included a ₦5 million good payable to the Federal Government and a obligatory apology in two nationwide newspapers and on her Facebook net web page, directives which the Senate says have not been complied with.
“Till date, these directives remain uncomplied with,” Adaramodu acknowledged. “The Senate emphasises once more, there is no enforceable order directing her immediate return to the Chamber.”
He issued a stern warning to the senator, urging her to not strain her strategy into the chambers, as such movement would “undermine the dignity of the Senate and violate due process.”
“We advise the Distinguished Senator to refrain from any attempt to storm the Senate on Tuesday under a false pretext, as doing so would not only be premature but also undermine the dignity of the Senate,” the assertion warned.
The Senate maintained that it stays devoted to upholding the rule of laws and respecting the sanctity of its inside disciplinary mechanisms.
Adaramodu added that the institution will, ultimately, take into consideration the courtroom’s advisory regarding a potential evaluation of its Standing Orders and Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension.
“Until then,” he concluded, “she is respectfully advised to stay away from the Senate chambers and allow due process to run its full course.”
Both the recall and contempt circumstances are nonetheless pending in courtroom, as Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan have each filed separate appeals.
