In latest months, plenty of commentaries have surfaced throughout blogs and information platforms questioning the prophetic credibility of Primate Elijah Ayodele. Some pose provocative titles like, “Primate Ayodele: A Priest or Political Analyst?” Others go so far as itemizing what they declare are “failed prophecies,” casting doubt on the authenticity of his non secular perception and workplace.
This response seeks to carry readability to these accusations and supply context for understanding prophetic messages, particularly in an age the place non secular perception is continuously judged by public opinion quite than scriptural and historic priority.
Prophets and Politics Are Not Mutually Exclusive
To start, it’s value noting that in Scripture, prophets routinely engaged with the political methods of their time. Isaiah suggested kings. Jeremiah delivered warnings to governments. Daniel prophesied in royal courts. Elijah confronted political authorities immediately.
In that gentle, Primate Ayodele’s engagement with nationwide and world affairs isn’t political evaluation within the typical sense. It is per the biblical function of a prophet, providing divine perception into societal, governmental, and non secular dynamics. Speaking on political points doesn’t disqualify a prophet; it usually confirms their project.
Prophecy Is Not a Prediction Game
Many of the criticisms surrounding Primate Ayodele’s phrases replicate a elementary misunderstanding of what prophecy is.
Prophecy isn’t a wager, a prediction, or a set forecast. It is a divine message, generally conditional, usually time delicate, and continuously misunderstood. In the Bible, Jonah’s prophecy of Nineveh’s destruction didn’t come to cross, not as a result of he was fallacious, however as a result of the folks repented and God confirmed mercy. That sample recurs all through Scripture.
Thus, what some label as “failed prophecies” are in lots of instances warnings meant to impress change, or insights topic to response or non secular variables.
Setting the Record Straight: Eight Claims and Their Context
1. The U.S. Election and Kamala Harris
A broadly circulated declare means that Primate Ayodele stated Kamala Harris would win the 2024 U.S. presidential election, and that this has confirmed false due to Trump’s perceived momentum.
The precise prophecy, as recorded in Daily Post Nigeria (September 29, 2024) and The Eagle Online (October 2024), said:
“If the election were held today, Donald Trump would lose.”
“Kamala Harris has all it takes to win, but she must work very hard. If she relaxes, she will be cheated out of victory.”
“Trump will be a disaster if he wins, and if he loses, he will instigate protests.”
“She should work very nicely as a result of Trump has last-minute technique that may give him victory but when Kamala Harris works on these states,
“Trump will fail.”
The prophet suggested Harris to place all her energy collectively as a result of the election could be robust and victory probabilities could be very slim.
“God is angry with Trump. He must seek divine mercy to avoid judgment.”
These will not be declarations of ultimate outcomes. They are conditional prophecies to each events, tied to the present state of non secular and political dynamics on the time they got. Nowhere did the prophet declare Harris because the confirmed winner or Trump as a assured loser.
2. Liverpool vs. Luton Town Match
Another declare was that Primate Ayodele gave a “failed prophecy” a couple of soccer match between Liverpool and Luton, saying Liverpool would win.
What was missed is that the prophecy was by no means meant for gamblers or sports activities bettors. It was a non secular warning that impressed Luton to regulate and battle again, simply as biblical warnings usually led cities to vary course and keep away from judgment. In that context, the end result doesn’t invalidate the message. It highlights its meant goal: to immediate a response, which Luton administration did.
