Making Our Votes to Count: Action, the Antidote to Cynicism
The gravest risk to free and truthful elections in Nigeria in 2027 is cynicism. It is just not the corrupt INEC. It is just not the compromised judiciary. It is just not the partisan safety businesses. The gravest risk to free and truthful elections in 2027 is crippling and widespread cynicism that results in inaction, or ineffective actions. My worry for the 2027 basic elections is that we now have given up on the potential for free and truthful elections in 2027. We will come again to debate what free and truthful election means and requires. But within the meantime, you will need to word that the conduct of the Anambra Governorship Election has additional deepened cynicism and scale back belief within the prospect of electoral integrity in 2027 and past. `
Many individuals on this corridor imagine that the 2027 presidential election can be rigged as a result of the Tinubu administration has not manifested any dedication to electoral reform. These cynics level to the truth that since coming to energy, President Tinubu has not made any main speech promising electoral reform. He has not taken any presidential motion in assist of electoral reform. Unlike President Jonathan and Buhari who both submitted a invoice to amend the electoral legislation or arrange an electoral reform committee to assessment the electoral regime, President Tinubu has completed nothing about electoral reform. He has really worsened the atmosphere of electoral integrity by making partisan appointments into the electoral administration physique. These clear and incontestable items of proof undermine religion in free and truthful elections in 2027. To add to those gloomy prognoses, cynics of electoral integrity make this telling assertion: “Tinubu is not Jonathan who conducted a free and fair elections that ended his tenure. Tinubu is not a gentleman oo. Tinubu is Jagaban”.
Let me begin by saying that these prognoses could also be true. Obviously Tinubu is just not Jonathan. Obviously, the political panorama has shifted towards a extra huge state seize. For the primary time in an extended whereas, everybody who has one thing to do with the administration of elections is related to President Tinubu both by ethnicity or political alliance. President Tinubu has shredded the tacit understanding that the incumbent chooses the electoral umpire exterior his ethnic and geopolitical bloc. We could not make heavy climate out of this. But once we marry it along with the truth that the top of the safety and the judiciary are all from Tinubu ethnic group and that Nigeria’s politics has remained wedded to ethnicity greater than anyplace else in Africa, as Crawford Young famous many years in the past, we could come to grasp the deep cynicism spreading throughout Nigeria in regards to the prospects of free and truthful elections in 2027.
Before going additional on this discourse, you will need to make some factors clear. Nigeria has an issue with credible elections. This downside is as historic as it’s widespread. It can also be an African downside as we see it in all African post-colonial states. Credible elections have been the exception slightly than the rule in Nigeria’s political historical past. Our elections are at all times rigged in a single type or one other. Of course, we now have had a couple of elections which have been typically adjudged as free and truthful. Two that readily come to thoughts are the 1993 Presidential election and the 2015 presidential election. When Nigerians described these elections as free and truthful, it doesn’t imply that there have been no important manipulations or frauds in these elections. Sometimes elections which were credited as free and truthful in Nigeria have been grossly manipulated. Oftentimes, they’re concluded as free and truthful as a result of the outcomes aligned with well-liked curiosity or that the incumbent misplaced. It is on this sense that most individuals take into account the 2015 election as free and truthful. That election resulted within the defeat of the incumbent ruling get together, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) by the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC). Hence, individuals hailed it as free and truthful. But if you happen to comply with the report of election observers you’ll understand that the election was grossly rigged, particularly in northern Nigeria the place the digital card reader failed, and bogus outcomes have been declared.
The level of the above is to not revisit the controversy in regards to the 2015 presidential defeat however to level out that elections are normally rigged in Nigeria. The story can also be the identical throughout Africa. The flawed nature of elections in most African nations have one thing to do with their historical past and the illegitimacy of their political establishments. The contest of political energy in societies outlined by brutal management of political energy and constructed on the muse of a political economic system of utmost exploitation would essentially be extraordinarily flawed. The interaction of ethnocentric politics and lack of accountability signifies that politics wouldn’t be mediated by values of civility and respect for self-determination. So, in a default mode, elections in Nigeria, as in different African nations, can be flawed and fraudulent as Justice Nsofor of the Nigerian Supreme Court as soon as opined within the electoral case between Yaradua and Buhari.
This historic path-dependency in electoral manipulation is additional worsened by the {economic} and social advantages of successful elections and the large prices of dropping it. Elections are determinants of {economic} and social success. This is due to the political economic system of public places of work in Nigeria. There is a lot to realize by successful elections and attending to public workplace. This subsequently will increase the stakes in elections and turns them from ladder to public service to deathly struggles. The political economic system of public workplace makes election all-important and will increase the disposition to think about election as warfare. Since all is truthful in warfare, all is truthful in elections. Ironically, this is among the causes for the criminalization of elections in Nigeria. As Oxford political scientist and Nigerian knowledgeable, Paul Collier, rightly argues in his Wars, Guns,and Votes: Democracy in Dangerous Places (2010), when elections turn into criminalized it signifies that by a pure choice solely criminals can be concerned in elections.
Our problem is to interrupt this path-dependency. As social scientists word it’s at all times tough to interrupt a path-dependency. It is just not unattainable. But some pure legislation appears to predicate objects to proceed in a specific route of movement except a robust power acts on it to vary route. So, Nigeria is on a foul trajectory in electoral integrity. But it might probably change route. What must be completed to vary Nigeria’s route in electoral issues, away from manipulation and fraud and in direction of accountability and integrity? I’ll hope to indicate how this will occur. But first, why ought to we trouble about correcting programs? Does free and truthful elections matter that a lot?
Why Free and Fair Elections Matter:
Why ought to we care that a lot about making our votes rely? Should a nation trouble a lot about free and truthful elections? This query assumes further significance within the current context of rising incidence of navy rule in our subregion. In current occasions we now have heard very respectable voices query the utility of democracy. Why ought to we care a lot about democracy when it has not put meals on the desk, they are saying. The most up-to-date and most notable of those dissenters is former President Obasanjo who, maybe pissed off by the poverty and instability generated by the so-called democratic politics in Africa has puzzled whether or not democracy is appropriate for African societies. In his view, the failure of democracy to provide high quality {economic} and social items in Africa could also be extra to democracy’s incompatibility than to the incompetence of African leaders. Well, the jury remains to be out on that time. But what is just not debatable is that for younger individuals within the African continent, democracy is quick dropping its attraction. Opinion polls present that increasingly more African youths have gotten extra distrustful of democracy and accepting of navy rule. Many of them who by no means skilled the brutal days of navy dictatorship within the continent are even romantic about navy rule. We can see this virus in how youths in West Africa appear to embrace the navy regimes in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger. In these contexts, why would a Nigerian in 2025 trouble about free and truthful elections in 2027?
The reality is that regardless of the failings of democratic governance in Nigeria and lots of the African nations, it can be crucial that we proceed to care about free and truthful elections. The customary concept is that elections matter as a result of they supply incentives for good governance. If we elect our consultant in a free and truthful elections, they’ve extra incentives to take heed to us. They know that their profession in politics will depend on what the individuals take into consideration their stewardship. This is the magic of free and truthful elections. If elections are free and truthful, that’s, if elections are aggressive such that these in energy, whether or not within the government or legislature, will be simply voted out, there’s better risk that these in energy will likely be extra conscious of the views and pursuits of the electorates. At the top of the day, the nice political economist, Arthur Schumpeter outlined democracy because the mechanism by which these in energy reply to the wants of the individuals. The enchantment of elections is that it’s the incentive in democracy for these in authority to take heed to the issues of the individuals.
The argument about whether or not elections matter is in the end a debate in regards to the worth of democracy. Many have pointed to the capability of authoritarian governments to generate sustained {economic} progress as an argument in opposition to democracy. The level is, if authoritarian governments can generate and maintain {economic} progress, why do we have to have electoral democracy? Liberal democrats have responded to this argument by making two potential arguments. First, they argue that an authoritarian authorities can not maintain {economic} progress. Second, they argue that even when authoritarian regimes create and maintain {economic} progress, their {economic} success is just not healthful as a result of it undermines freedom.
I feel for a society like ours, a very powerful motive for committing to free and truthful elections is that it’s the greatest option to assure political stability and scale back tendency to conflicts. This is what students like Adam Przeworski name ‘the minimalist theory of democracy’. The minimalist concept justifies democracy, and subsequently elections, on the straightforward motive that it’s primarily a battle administration system. He begins his discourse by acknowledging the issue with democracy and elections. He argues that “In many democracies giant variety of individuals really feel that elections solely perpetuate the rule of ‘establishment’, ‘elites’, even ‘caste’, whereas on the different excessive many are alarmed by the rise of ‘populist’, ‘xenophobic, repressive, and often racist parties.” Considering its warts and all, he argues that elections are “but a framework within which somewhat equal, somewhat effective, and somewhat free people can struggle peacefully to improve the world according to their different visions, values, and interests”. He argues further that “popular criticism of election.. are mistaken, based on an incorrect understanding of elections as a mechanism by which we decide as a collectivity… in societies in which people have different interests and divergent values, looking for rationality is futile, but that elections provide an instruction to governments to minimize the dissatisfaction with how we are governed”.
So, elections matter because it is a conflict-avoidance and conflict-mitigating mechanism.
So, even if we are cynical about the ability of elections to generate economic and social goods or doubt the democratic credentials of elections, we should all demand for free and fair elections because elections are the only way a plural society like ours can have peaceful transitions to power. This is the minimalist conception of election. Without free and fair election, we cannot guarantee political stability with our level of pluralism and diversities.
But elections matter if they are competitive. If elections are not competitive, they lack their regulative power. An uncompetitive election is an election that does not have the regulative power to ensure stable and peaceful transition to power. It is an election that leads to conflict and instability. The election that matters for economic and political change is a competitive election. It is an election that “offers a real choice of governments, when people can remove incumbents and choose their successors, if they choose”. When elections are not competitive, political combatants with their divergent interests and differing ideologies and values would preclude that they cannot win as long as they are not in charge of political power. If there is a credible electoral system in which votes count, these political combatants will play by the rules with the hope that if they build a smart alliance and coalition they will come to power. But if there is no possibility of defeating the incumbent political interests electorally because elections are not free and fair, there would be incentive to resort to self-help, which culminates in the use of violence to win political power. The result would be conflicts and even chaos.
Nigeria should take electoral reform seriously because its political history is full of political crises arising from bad elections. Right after independence in 1960, Nigeria’s democracy didn’t take lengthy to unravel. At the guts of the collapse of the Nigerian independence constitutional order is dispute over election outcomes. Although many have pointed to how the defective political establishment of the precolonial interval preconditioned Nigeria democracy to disaster. But the speedy set off for the convulsion that resulted within the navy coup in 1966 is disputes and violence over elections. The 1966 was partly justified to rescue the nation from the wanton violence that has engulfed Western Nigeria due to disputed election outcomes. As foremost modern Nigerian historian, Toyin Falola, put it in his guide with Matthew M Heaton (A History of Nigeria, Cambridge, 2014, web page 173), “In the Western Region, the collapse of the unpopular NNDP regime were greeted with jubilation, and the rioting and unrest that had plagued the region since the October elections came to an almost immediate end”. The worry of northern domination and the dearth of belief within the electoral system as a viable technique of eradicating the federal government led to violence that destroyed the effectiveness and de facto legitimacy of the democratic authorities. The identical scenario introduced the second and third republics to an abrupt finish. In the Second Republic, the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) had perfected its rigging methods to make sure it remained in energy however the selection of the electorates. As the individuals bought disillusioned and hopeless, the navy discovered an excuse to strike and finish Nigeria’s electoral autocracy.
Nigeria’s 4 republics have been truncated due to widespread electoral malpractices that led to violence and threatened political stability and gave the navy an excuse to disrupt democratic rule. The manipulations and violence of the 1964 Federal Election have been a few of the sturdy distant causes of the collapse of the First Republic. The Second Republic suffered an analogous destiny. Reputable political scientist and scholar of Nigerian politics, Richard A. Joseph reviewed political occasions within the Second Republic and concluded that though there are lots of dimensions of the temporary lifetime of the republic, probably the most crucial and revealing is the conduct of the 1983 election through which “a situation of near chaos developed as the party campaign and subsequent election became marked by acts of increasing violence and lawlessness” (Democracy and prebendal politics in Nigeria: The rise and fall of the Second Republic, Cambridge 1987 pages 153-4). Of course, there have been many components and dynamisms that led to the abrupt termination of those republics, together with the lack to raise political campaigns and practices and foster nationwide ideology and transformational management, however the incapability to reasonable ethnic and particular person competitors for entry to political events by a reputable and efficient electoral system lies on the coronary heart of Nigeria’s political tragedy.
Nigeria may be taught classes from different African nations, particularly its West African neighbors of Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso. These nations are within the agency grip of navy dictatorship. There are many components that specify democratic backsliding in these African nations. High charges of poverty and virulent ethnocentric politics play a key position in destabilizing them. The corrupt management that stagnated {economic} progress and weaponized poverty destroyed social stability. But dangerous elections play a task in undermining democracy in these nations. In Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso, election outcomes have been significantly disputed resulting in widespread violence and coup plots. It is notable that in Guinea, controversies and violence over rigged elections resulted in navy coup. The impacts of dangerous elections are magnified due to preexisting ethnic divisions and ethnocentric sentiments and hatred which makes clear and credible elections a necessity. The instrumental worth of democratic elections, which is that they represent an efficient mechanism for dispute decision in a plural society, is crucial to the survival of democracy and growth within the area.
Nigeria should take electoral reform significantly as a result of the standard of its elections would add to the chances of {economic} and social growth and its capacity to flee state failure which is turning into a risk for nations within the West African area. Credible and dependable elections present sturdy incentive for public officers to ship on marketing campaign guarantees because it ensures responsiveness since there’s actual risk of electorates eradicating them from political places of work. Competitive elections sign to elected officers that regardless of the complexities and challenges of recent governance, they have to tackle the issues of the individuals in the event that they need to retain their political places of work. This incentive construction doesn’t assure growth. But it creates a mechanism for presidency responsiveness which is among the parts of democracy. The better motive why the Nigerian elites ought to take significantly the duty of reforming the electoral system is to keep away from the failure of democracy which can outcome within the return of the navy. We have walked this path earlier than, and plenty of of our neighbors are again on it. We shouldn’t fall again into navy rule. It is ruinous. And a method we are able to assure that’s by making certain that elections are actually aggressive in order that out-groups have actual hope of turning into in-groups by the poll field.
The Need for Election Integrity Defense Actions:
If we’re instructed by historical past, then we must always not anticipate the present administration to deliberately conduct free and truthful elections in 2027. Actually, we must always anticipate that the Tinubu administration would do every little thing it might probably to not conduct free and truthful elections. The easy motive for this guided pessimism is that free and truthful election normally favors the opposition, particularly in a interval the place the incumbent has not evidently delivered to expectation. This realism is just not pessimism. It is to allow us to plan what I name ‘election integrity defense actions’. That is, a set of coherent actions involving totally different actors within the election administration panorama, and focused at defending the integrity of elections. The central concept in regards to the election integrity protection system is the acceptance of the straightforward indisputable fact that social outcomes are outcomes of social dialectics. Incredible and rigged elections don’t drop from heaven. It is a manufactured end result. The coronary heart of this election protection system is a recognition that election rigging or manipulation is a strategic conduct that must be overcome. It is just not an accident of historical past; it’s not an accident. It is a social pathology bolstered by advantages which are comprehensible.
An essential part of an efficient electoral integrity safety system is the flexibility to dimension the pathology of electoral manipulation. We obtain nothing by cynicism or hysteria. There is an unthinking social psychology in Nigeria that exaggerates each downside and thereby debilitates strategic pondering by making each social downside imponderable. What is just not correctly understood can’t be successfully solved. So, if we exaggerate the extent of fraudulent elections in Nigeria or can not correctly break down the way it manifests, we can not clear up the issue. There is want for much less hysteria and extra understanding in an effort to develop efficient responses to the issue of election rigging or fraud. We ought to at all times see elections as an issue that may and ought to be solved, not as a actuality.
What I name for is having a correct perspective about the issue of unbelievable and dangerous elections as a prelude to fixing the issue. To obtain such a correct perspective, you will need to perceive how elections are bettering in Nigeria and the place it’s getting worse. The logistics and know-how of election are bettering in Nigeria. The processes are getting higher. We have much less complaints about late arrival of voting supplies or suppression of voters. We are additionally seeing much less of the earlier malpractices of writing outcomes whereas voting remains to be ongoing. Electronic accreditation has diminished the full variety of votes as a result of there’s much less room for the writing of fictitious numbers we’re used to previously. So, there’s some enchancment. The enchancment has opened new vistas of electoral malpractices. In the 2023 presidential elections we noticed a brand new sort of manipulation when the management of the electoral administration physique intentionally handed the unsuitable password to presiding officers so they may not add outcomes of the presidential election to its digital portal. This singular act destroyed the credibility of the ballot as many outcomes sheets have been mutilated. In the Edo Governorship election, the allegation was that INEC declared completely faux outcomes, exhibiting that even when logistics and know-how enhance, the corruption of the electoral officers might stay a serious problem to free and truthful elections.
What does this argument imply for electoral integrity going into the 2027 basic elections? It underlines the significance of civic vigilance. We should be vigilant and good. Vigilance, they are saying, is the worth we pay for freedom. This is even more true in issues of free and truthful elections. There are 4 zones the place we must be vigilant in tackling the flawed and unbelievable electoral system as a social downside. These zones are (a) INEC, (b) political get together, (c) civil society, and (d) judiciary. These totally different zones want methods crafted with perception about how the zone operates.
Engaging INEC:
INEC is an establishment. There is an institutional logic. The downside is that INEC is deeply inefficient and lacks the extent of institutional integrity to make sure transparency and accountability in a corrupt nation like Nigeria. Although INEC has improved in its effectivity relative to the logistical challenges it faces and is now extra environment friendly within the deployment of know-how, the integrity of its processes could be very low. INEC doesn’t make choices with the usual integrity anticipated of a regulator. Its inner guidelines are underdeveloped. One clarification for INEC’s institutional weak spot is the poor high quality of engagement by its exterior stakeholders. It is essential to have interaction INEC in a way that forces it to develop the precise guidelines and apply them pretty and successfully.
READ ALSO: Sam Amadi Warns: Nigeria Risks Conflict Without Credible Elections
The high quality of engagement between INEC and the political events is horrible and doesn’t make for effectiveness and equity. This is extra so within the case of opposition events the place there isn’t a severe institutional illustration and absence of vigilance and resistance. INEC is left to behave authoritarian and make choices with out stakeholder illustration and deliberation. As a regulator, INEC ought to not make choices with out formal illustration by legal professionals of political events. The political events, particularly opposition events, should problem most of INEC’s choices in court docket. But they don’t. The lack of depth and smartness within the method the political events have interaction INEC is one explanation for its lack of institutional integrity and regulatory functionality.
Political Parties Oversight:
The political events should be the linchpin of mandate safety. The events are the primary beneficiaries of free and truthful elections as they may win elections and type authorities. The opposition stands to realize extra as dangerous elections normally favor incumbents. Unfortunately, political events have normally outsourced electoral vigilance to civil society {groups}. This is proof of the weak spot of opposition political events and the results of that weak spot. The greatest push in direction of regulatory equity and impartiality ought to come from the political events. They ought to actively watch what the election regulator does and battle to verify they comply with the legislation and act pretty and firmly. The political events themselves have a duty to entrench democracy of their inner affairs, particularly within the conduct of main elections. The blame for rigged elections goes principally to political events who don’t present severe dedication to due course of and safety of democratic rights of their individuals. Nigeria’s decline within the high quality of democracy owes a lot to the poor high quality of its political events. Today Nigeria is rated as an electoral autocracy. Part of the explanations for this democracy declining is that political events aren’t intensely selling democracy and policing the electoral system. With sturdy opposition get together activism and mobilization of the inhabitants to turn into protectors of techniques and processes for electoral integrity, it will likely be tough to rig elections in Nigeria.
Reinventing Civil Society:
Civil society performs a key position in defending the integrity of Nigeria’s elections. The position of the civil society has grown as worldwide growth help to elections in Nigeria has elevated. But many will agree that the position performed by civil society has not been altogether helpful. The allegation is predicated on the tame response of those {groups} to frauds and manipulations within the electoral course of. It is true that these {groups} have interaction in election monitoring and observations. But they don’t take actual actions to counter the manipulations of the electoral system. Many occasions the leaders of the group present legitimacy to those illicit procedures. If we will need to have free and truthful elections in 2027 then the civil society {groups} should recalibrate and turn into extra forceful and strategic protectors of electoral integrity, not unwitting instruments within the legitimation of electoral villainy.
The Need for Intelligent and Honest Judiciary:
The judiciary is now the important thing participant within the electoral course of. The pathology of elections in Nigeria is that courts now elect candidates as a substitute of electorates. The usurpation of the powers of the electorates by courts and tribunals have raised concern in regards to the judicialisation of elections. But the tragedy is that when the court docket usurps the ability of the individuals to elect their leaders in pursuit of judicial assessment, it finally ends up undermining electoral justice due to the way it has confirmed electoral malpractices. The guidelines of electoral procedures within the courts and tribunals are loaded in opposition to petitioners. The guidelines require petitioners to preload all proof and paperwork they would wish to show electoral malpractices in a petition that must be filed inside a short while after the declaration of outcomes. In the meantime, the electoral administration physique refuses to supply petitioners with related paperwork to show their case. The court docket or tribunal punishes the petitioner for incapability to entrance load these proof and paperwork which are within the custody of the election supervisor who refuses to make them out there to the petitioner.
The judiciary has turn into the weakest phase of the electoral administration panorama. It must be fastened earlier than we are able to have a superb assure of free and truthful elections in 2027. The actuality is that the judges could not management themselves. They would wish the activism of residents and politicians to push them to the extent of optimistic jurisprudence that may assure electoral justice. We can be taught from the historical past of notable adjustments on the planet that except residents are able to knock persistently and loudly on the door of justice, justice is rarely served. We should be good and protracted to maneuver ahead with transformation within the electoral course of.
Conclusion:
The actual message of this speech is that the gravest risk to free and truthful elections in Nigeria in 2027 is cynicism, not the corruption and compromise of INEC, safety businesses, and the judiciary. The reply to cynicism is sensible and constant actions. We must be vigilant, energetic and progressive within the battle to make sure Nigerian democracy survives the assault of unbridled electoral theft.
Four zones of motion
INEC
Political events
Civil society
Judiciary
